Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12531 - 12540 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 12531 - 12540 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
Bettendorf Transfer, Inc. v. Madison Freight Systems, Inc.
. Bettendorf claimed Madison was responsible for $34,373.30 in damages to the leased property. After a bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5907 - 2017-09-19
. Bettendorf claimed Madison was responsible for $34,373.30 in damages to the leased property. After a bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5907 - 2017-09-19
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
ineffective assistance claim, he started in the wrong forum. His petition faults appointed counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24
ineffective assistance claim, he started in the wrong forum. His petition faults appointed counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
of $1,999.40.2 Brandt claims that the circuit 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
of $1,999.40.2 Brandt claims that the circuit 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
Barbara L. Batt v. Guineth L. Sweeney
SETTLEMENT OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS ARISING FROM BODILY INJURY CAUSED BY ACCIDENT ON 06/18/99.” We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4117 - 2005-03-31
SETTLEMENT OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS ARISING FROM BODILY INJURY CAUSED BY ACCIDENT ON 06/18/99.” We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
habeas relief on his ineffective assistance claim, he started in the wrong forum. His petition faults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
habeas relief on his ineffective assistance claim, he started in the wrong forum. His petition faults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] The dispositive issue is whether Leiser’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138500 - 2015-03-24
for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] The dispositive issue is whether Leiser’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138500 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.”). Warren’s reconsideration motion asked the circuit court to reconsider Warren’s claim that a witness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098693 - 2026-04-02
.”). Warren’s reconsideration motion asked the circuit court to reconsider Warren’s claim that a witness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098693 - 2026-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.”). Warren’s reconsideration motion asked the circuit court to reconsider Warren’s claim that a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098693 - 2026-04-02
.”). Warren’s reconsideration motion asked the circuit court to reconsider Warren’s claim that a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098693 - 2026-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court held the claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The Rileys assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93405 - 2013-03-04
. The circuit court held the claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The Rileys assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93405 - 2013-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
to reopen a claim against Frederick Schwertfeger’s estate that was withdrawn by stipulation of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29177 - 2007-05-23
to reopen a claim against Frederick Schwertfeger’s estate that was withdrawn by stipulation of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29177 - 2007-05-23