Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12531 - 12540 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 12531 - 12540 of 58510 for speedy trial.
WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1275-CR Complete Title...
(1980).[2] He also argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23
(1980).[2] He also argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2011AP2432-CR 2 pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
No. 2011AP2432-CR 2 pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial; and (2) new evidence exists warranting a new trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
trial; and (2) new evidence exists warranting a new trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
Allen J. Thomas v. State
, the trial court reached the correct decision in dismissing his petition. Accordingly, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court reached the correct decision in dismissing his petition. Accordingly, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
to the charges. By postconviction motion, he alleged that the trial court improperly sentenced him to five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
to the charges. By postconviction motion, he alleged that the trial court improperly sentenced him to five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hampton
and were treated as if they were consolidated in the trial court. Because they were not consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9599 - 2017-09-19
and were treated as if they were consolidated in the trial court. Because they were not consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9599 - 2017-09-19
Ginny Barth v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
. They argue that the trial court erred when it refused to allow them to amend their pleadings to allege a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5249 - 2005-03-31
. They argue that the trial court erred when it refused to allow them to amend their pleadings to allege a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5249 - 2005-03-31
State v. William E. Hampton
, contrary to § 813.12(8)(b), Stats.[3] The trial court withheld sentence and imposed three year concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9600 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 813.12(8)(b), Stats.[3] The trial court withheld sentence and imposed three year concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vicki L. Johnson v. Christopher T. Johnson
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10446 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10446 - 2017-09-20
State v. Chris M. Holland
to trial, the defendant, Chris M. Holland, inter alia, moved to suppress the chemical test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17948 - 2005-05-03
to trial, the defendant, Chris M. Holland, inter alia, moved to suppress the chemical test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17948 - 2005-05-03