Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12541 - 12550 of 62360 for child support.

[PDF] State v. William J. Church
. O'Brien, Judge. The conviction was for two counts of child enticement, one a violation of Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17318 - 2017-09-21

[MS WORD] JD-1762: Order for Recoupment of Costs of Legal Services
No. THE COURT FINDS: 1. The child/juvenile was provided legal counsel through the State Public Defender
/formdisplay/JD-1762.doc?formNumber=JD-1762&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-11-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reconfinement of Samuel Johnson. The dispositive issue is whether there was substantial evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68570 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
there was substantial evidence to support the agency’s decision. We conclude there was and, therefore, reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25

[PDF] State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
. Robert Von Haden, Jr., appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of causing mental harm to a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20

State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
of causing mental harm to a child and one count of disorderly conduct. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carl Kaminski v. David H. Schwarz
support obligations, and to county child support agencies, respectively. These provisions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17568 - 2017-09-21

02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
in the decision or order and must include supporting argument. No separate memorandum in support of the motion
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1127 - 2005-03-31

02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
in the decision or order and must include supporting argument. No separate memorandum in support of the motion
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=955 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
evidence was sufficient to support Evans’s conviction for the challenged counts, we affirm. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49119 - 2010-04-19