Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12541 - 12550 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Terry Locke v. Town of Menasha
). The meaning of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10733 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard the circuit court employs. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84063 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
if, in our de novo review, we determine there is any reasonable hypothesis that supports it. Smith, 342
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25

COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2). Summary judgment decisions are subject to de novo review. Metropolitan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103820 - 2013-11-04

State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13111 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reasoning. But our standard of review of the constitutional issue is de novo, so the State’s argument about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130497 - 2014-11-25

Kevin K. Parman v. Jeffrey D. Ogden
of a contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6997 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id., ¶11. ¶9 Here, the circuit court found that “the officer did articulate reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72624 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of West Allis v. Patrick T. Sheedy
law which this court reviews de novo. Jadair Inc. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 209 Wis. 2d 187
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17192 - 2017-09-21