Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12541 - 12550 of 17156 for probate/1000.
Search results 12541 - 12550 of 17156 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
State v. James E. Bulckaen
, the State agreed to recommend probation on one charge, and to argue for less than the maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20024 - 2017-09-21
, the State agreed to recommend probation on one charge, and to argue for less than the maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conditions and was reunified with Joan. Subsequently, M.J.C.’s probation was revoked due to a domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572370 - 2022-10-04
conditions and was reunified with Joan. Subsequently, M.J.C.’s probation was revoked due to a domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572370 - 2022-10-04
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
argued for probation or a minimal sentence, primarily citing Cunningham’s advancing age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6570 - 2005-03-31
argued for probation or a minimal sentence, primarily citing Cunningham’s advancing age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pleas because his attorney told him he likely would receive only probation and he also was under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239431 - 2019-04-24
pleas because his attorney told him he likely would receive only probation and he also was under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239431 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prior revocations from both probation and extended supervision. The court observed that much
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226523 - 2018-11-06
prior revocations from both probation and extended supervision. The court observed that much
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226523 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then imposed and stayed a thirty-day jail term with Huber privileges, subject to one year of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747656 - 2024-01-04
then imposed and stayed a thirty-day jail term with Huber privileges, subject to one year of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747656 - 2024-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS
that in materials she relied upon to reach her opinion, there was a reference made by another examiner, a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114087 - 2014-06-09
that in materials she relied upon to reach her opinion, there was a reference made by another examiner, a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114087 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] Based on the agent’s credible testimony, the search was a probation and parole (or supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97608 - 2013-06-04
.[2] Based on the agent’s credible testimony, the search was a probation and parole (or supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97608 - 2013-06-04
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David V. Penn
on probation for three years, with six months in the county jail with Huber privileges, and ordered to perform
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16991 - 2005-03-31
on probation for three years, with six months in the county jail with Huber privileges, and ordered to perform
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
was sentenced in federal court to three years probation, conditioned on 150 days of home confinement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21
was sentenced in federal court to three years probation, conditioned on 150 days of home confinement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21