Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12541 - 12550 of 18357 for re.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT I IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO M. J. H., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195688 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO C. P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240496 - 2019-05-09

COURT OF APPEALS
In re the termination of parental rights to Na'Keyshia C., a person under the age of 18: Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51816 - 2010-07-07

Lisa A. Koenigs v. Frank H. Coker
In re the Marriage of: Lisa A. Koenigs, f/k/a Lisa Koenigs-Coker, Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6523 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sterling Rachwal
” along the way, and eventually ascertained the trial judge’s true “intent” and re-calculated the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13794 - 2005-03-31

Stacy S. v. Brian R.
In re the Paternity of Erin M.R.: Stacy S. and the State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4460 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
In re the Paternity of G.M.T. Veronica Martin, n/k/a Veronica Butzlaff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30147 - 2007-09-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to this testimony. ¶18 On re-cross-examination, the prosecutor asked whether the detective “had some training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90288 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
should have restated and then re-examined the claims that he raised in Grady I using multiple analyses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Anne C. Puchner v. John D. Puchner
In re the Marriage of: ANNE C. PUCHNER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. JOHN D. PUCHNER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7913 - 2017-09-19