Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12551 - 12560 of 30012 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law for de novo review. Winnebago Cty. v. Christopher S., 2016 WI 1, ¶50, 366 Wis. 2d 1, __ N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163891 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lynn A. Soto v. Jose A. Soto
cannot use property division as an equitable means to award de facto maintenance. This contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14433 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standard and the application of those historical facts to constitutional principles de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181361 - 2017-09-21

State v. Alil Azizi
is a neutral and detached magistrate raises a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8987 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Bank One v. Linda L. Harris
. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. DILHR, 90 Wis.2d 408, 417, 280
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9147 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Pleasant Prairie v. Maureen M. McCarragher
disputed question (reasonable suspicion) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5989 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eugene Keeler
, 430 N.W.2d at 589. Whether charges are properly joined is a question of law, reviewed de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34171 - 2008-09-29

Dawn M. Malinowski v. Brian G. Malinowski
dismissed the order to show cause. Dawn sought a de novo review before the trial court. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2005-03-31