Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12551 - 12560 of 64079 for records/1000.
Search results 12551 - 12560 of 64079 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
official record. However, Knapp did not object to the alleged error in the report, and therefore he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
official record. However, Knapp did not object to the alleged error in the report, and therefore he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116719 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212718 - 2018-05-15
of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212718 - 2018-05-15
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
characterizes as an error in computation that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31141 - 2014-09-15
characterizes as an error in computation that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240730 - 2019-05-13
review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240730 - 2019-05-13
State v. Patrick C. Webster
hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin Criminal Investigation Bureau (WCIB) showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin Criminal Investigation Bureau (WCIB) showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP2027-CRNM 2 We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830231 - 2024-07-23
. No. 2023AP2027-CRNM 2 We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830231 - 2024-07-23
State v. Joseph C. Reinsbach
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31