Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12561 - 12570 of 62393 for child support.
Search results 12561 - 12570 of 62393 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Samantha H.
-2913 -2- than ten days in a secure detention facility if a delinquent child has violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11547 - 2017-09-19
-2913 -2- than ten days in a secure detention facility if a delinquent child has violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11547 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conditions prohibited him from committing any new crimes. The State charged him with four counts: child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902121 - 2025-01-22
conditions prohibited him from committing any new crimes. The State charged him with four counts: child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902121 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
interest of the child.” Id. Jennifer contends that the “physically or emotionally harmful” standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
interest of the child.” Id. Jennifer contends that the “physically or emotionally harmful” standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, the father of her child, in contempt of court for violating a physical placement order by taking their child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68131 - 2011-07-19
, the father of her child, in contempt of court for violating a physical placement order by taking their child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68131 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
Warren Slocum v. Sandra Hohman
pays for the evaluation, denying his request to review the child’s psychological record, requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
pays for the evaluation, denying his request to review the child’s psychological record, requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment convicting him of second-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156311 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment convicting him of second-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156311 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erroneously declined to sequester the child’s stepfather, J.J., at trial. We reject G.G.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151842 - 2017-09-21
court erroneously declined to sequester the child’s stepfather, J.J., at trial. We reject G.G.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151842 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
argues that the circuit court erred when it sentenced him by referring to him as “a preferential child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
argues that the circuit court erred when it sentenced him by referring to him as “a preferential child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him of multiple counts of sexual assault of a child. He contends that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124672 - 2017-09-21
convicting him of multiple counts of sexual assault of a child. He contends that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124672 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
it sentenced him by referring to him as “a preferential child molester” and “disgusting,” that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
it sentenced him by referring to him as “a preferential child molester” and “disgusting,” that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21