Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12561 - 12570 of 50122 for our.
Search results 12561 - 12570 of 50122 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
that distinction from our examination of Rudig’s deposition testimony. At the deposition, counsel repeatedly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
that distinction from our examination of Rudig’s deposition testimony. At the deposition, counsel repeatedly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, for failing to seek a plea withdrawal at the time of sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
, for failing to seek a plea withdrawal at the time of sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243911 - 2019-07-24
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243911 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be given to each factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
to be given to each factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
Linda L. Koziara v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to our order of June 4, 2002, this case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5251 - 2017-09-19
to our order of June 4, 2002, this case was placed on the expedited appeals calendar. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5251 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58803 - 2014-09-15
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals an order denying a motion to modify his child support obligation. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194393 - 2017-09-21
se, appeals an order denying a motion to modify his child support obligation. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194393 - 2017-09-21