Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12561 - 12570 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 12561 - 12570 of 64077 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
809.32 (2005-06),[1] so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31746 - 2008-02-06
809.32 (2005-06),[1] so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31746 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801441 - 2024-05-15
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801441 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96683 - 2013-05-14
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96683 - 2013-05-14
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether he shows remorse. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether he shows remorse. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record shows a stipulated payment plan, he was never a party to it and never authorized an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108576 - 2017-09-21
that the record shows a stipulated payment plan, he was never a party to it and never authorized an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108576 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22