Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12571 - 12580 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12571 - 12580 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Robert Senda v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of fact, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis.2d 106, 114
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9109 - 2005-03-31
of fact, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis.2d 106, 114
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9109 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
set of facts is a question of law and therefore is reviewed de novo. State v. Bruski, 2007 WI 25, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31754 - 2008-02-06
set of facts is a question of law and therefore is reviewed de novo. State v. Bruski, 2007 WI 25, ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31754 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Justin P. Brandl
clearly erroneous, but we apply those facts to the law de novo. Id. ¶10 A warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26040 - 2017-09-21
clearly erroneous, but we apply those facts to the law de novo. Id. ¶10 A warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26040 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The Honorable Linda M. Van De Water imposed Mayberry’s sentence. No. 2022AP1263-CR 3 reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680068 - 2023-07-19
The Honorable Linda M. Van De Water imposed Mayberry’s sentence. No. 2022AP1263-CR 3 reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680068 - 2023-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Benash
. Whether a judge is neutral and detached is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9448 - 2017-09-19
. Whether a judge is neutral and detached is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9448 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph H. Savage
omitted). When reviewing a bindover determination, we will examine the record de novo to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19274 - 2017-09-21
omitted). When reviewing a bindover determination, we will examine the record de novo to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas G. Martwick
that while Kennedy states that the question is one of constitutional fact reviewed de novo, the case upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13515 - 2017-09-21
that while Kennedy states that the question is one of constitutional fact reviewed de novo, the case upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, upholding the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
, upholding the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. A breach is material and substantial when it “defeats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28620 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. A breach is material and substantial when it “defeats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28620 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, and we review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27
erroneous, and we review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27