Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12571 - 12580 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 12571 - 12580 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Brady B.
with regard to charging the female juvenile. Such a record was not made. Second, the State has not really
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14191 - 2014-09-15
with regard to charging the female juvenile. Such a record was not made. Second, the State has not really
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14191 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
official record. However, Knapp did not object to the alleged error in the report, and therefore he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
official record. However, Knapp did not object to the alleged error in the report, and therefore he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259681 - 2020-05-13
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259681 - 2020-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2003-CRNM 2 reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156671 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2003-CRNM 2 reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156671 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven Warner
) whether the trial court improperly limited Warner's access to his victim's medical records; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7953 - 2005-03-31
) whether the trial court improperly limited Warner's access to his victim's medical records; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7953 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the record copy does. In this regard, the postconviction court explained that “[t]he back of the last page
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92811 - 2013-02-11
, the record copy does. In this regard, the postconviction court explained that “[t]he back of the last page
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92811 - 2013-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to remove an operating-while-under-the-influence-of-an-intoxicant offense (“OWI”) from his record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
to remove an operating-while-under-the-influence-of-an-intoxicant offense (“OWI”) from his record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
clear after further examination of Grant’s briefs and a review of the record that Grant’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120947 - 2014-09-03
clear after further examination of Grant’s briefs and a review of the record that Grant’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120947 - 2014-09-03