Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12571 - 12580 of 83881 for simple case search/1000.

State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
Iggens, was appointed to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel B. Knutson
and therefore affirm. The pertinent evidence in this case is undisputed. The evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11157 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
of a blood sample is a search and seizure within the meanings of the United States and Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52377 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
independently of the circuit court. Id. ΒΆ10 The taking of a blood sample is a search and seizure within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52377 - 2010-07-19

COURT OF APPEALS
court must determine: (1) whether a search or seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55300 - 2010-10-12

State v. Kyle D. Willenkamp
, the reasonableness of a search is a question of constitutional law that we review independently. See State v. Guzman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2376 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village of Westfield v. Thomas A. Moore
performance on all other field tests, provide probable cause to search a subject's breath with a Preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9941 - 2017-09-19

Village of Westfield v. Thomas A. Moore
other field tests, provide probable cause to search a subject's breath with a Preliminary Breath Test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9941 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the community caretaker function, the circuit court must determine: (1) whether a search or seizure within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55300 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kyle D. Willenkamp
, the reasonableness of a search is a question of constitutional law that we review independently. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2376 - 2017-09-19