Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12591 - 12600 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

State v. Jerry C.O.
reviews de novo. See Ornelas v. U.S., 116 S. Ct. 1657, 1651 (1996). Further, an appellate court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶6 To be entitled to resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107984 - 2014-02-10

State v. Robert E. Irish
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31

Waukesha County v. Spencer C.N.
Wis.2d 129, 416 N.W.2d 292 (1987), we will review the issue on appeal de novo. See State v. Dadas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13752 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
that this court resolves de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, a question of law that is reviewed de novo. See State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87285 - 2012-09-19

C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
We review de novo whether the agencies of the Winnebago Nation waived their sovereign immunity. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31

WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1529 Complete Title of...
no deference to the ALJ’s decision and apply de novo review.[2] DISCUSSION ¶7 The legislature has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82279 - 2012-08-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85468 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review constitutional issues de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44984 - 2014-09-15