Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12591 - 12600 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 12591 - 12600 of 74688 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. La'Shone Jackson
the information was not developed earlier. Based on this record, the court’s finding was not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2941 - 2017-09-19
the information was not developed earlier. Based on this record, the court’s finding was not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2941 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terrence D. Ross
. The record includes a commitment order issued because they were not paid. The state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13024 - 2005-03-31
. The record includes a commitment order issued because they were not paid. The state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13024 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose Salazar
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9980 - 2005-03-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9980 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven T. Geary
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12908 - 2005-03-31
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12908 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrence D. Ross
sixty days. The record includes a commitment order issued because they were not paid. The state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13024 - 2017-09-21
sixty days. The record includes a commitment order issued because they were not paid. The state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
decision. We affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15585 - 2017-09-21
decision. We affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on public policy grounds. The application of Wells to the present case is a significant focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31952 - 2014-09-15
on public policy grounds. The application of Wells to the present case is a significant focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31952 - 2014-09-15
Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15585 - 2005-03-31
affirm because: (1) the assessor acted as a de facto public officer, even if the assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15585 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that a nearly identical forfeiture clause in AFSCME’s Constitution[3] was void on public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31952 - 2008-02-27
determined that a nearly identical forfeiture clause in AFSCME’s Constitution[3] was void on public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31952 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County Public Safety Building. Joan tripped because there was an approximate 1¼ - 1½ inch offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454756 - 2021-11-18
County Public Safety Building. Joan tripped because there was an approximate 1¼ - 1½ inch offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454756 - 2021-11-18