Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 17421 for Cost.
Debra J.S. v. Thomas L.
court’s award of costs to Thomas. We deem this issue waived. We affirm the order. FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2005-03-31
court’s award of costs to Thomas. We deem this issue waived. We affirm the order. FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the sales comparison approach, the cost approach, and the income approach.” Id., ¶7 n.2. If adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65485 - 2014-09-15
: the sales comparison approach, the cost approach, and the income approach.” Id., ¶7 n.2. If adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65485 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals pro se from an order of the circuit court denying his motion to waive transcript costs related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-07-29
appeals pro se from an order of the circuit court denying his motion to waive transcript costs related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-07-29
Frontsheet
, as the prevailing party, is entitled to his costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees, but that Kilian
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67711 - 2011-07-31
, as the prevailing party, is entitled to his costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees, but that Kilian
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67711 - 2011-07-31
[PDF]
WI 65
that Kilian, as the prevailing party, is entitled to his costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67711 - 2014-09-15
that Kilian, as the prevailing party, is entitled to his costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67711 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
a public reprimand and imposition of the costs of this proceeding. Neither party has appealed from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32862 - 2008-05-28
a public reprimand and imposition of the costs of this proceeding. Neither party has appealed from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32862 - 2008-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
costs in the amount of $10,000. He argues that the circuit court erred when it refused to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
costs in the amount of $10,000. He argues that the circuit court erred when it refused to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to litigate: (1) whether Turner can challenge the imposition of fees and costs associated with county
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760557 - 2024-02-07
to litigate: (1) whether Turner can challenge the imposition of fees and costs associated with county
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760557 - 2024-02-07
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
for a period of three years and that he pay the costs of these proceedings. ¶2 We approve the stipulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16565 - 2005-03-31
for a period of three years and that he pay the costs of these proceedings. ¶2 We approve the stipulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
7. Prior to the hearing, Lamar repaired the billboard at a cost of $1,039.80. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27478 - 2014-09-15
7. Prior to the hearing, Lamar repaired the billboard at a cost of $1,039.80. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27478 - 2014-09-15