Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 6143 for li.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 6143 for li.
COURT OF APPEALS
, in a way that excludes the co-owner, that lies at the heart of that crime. Therefore, even if it is true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130272 - 2014-11-25
, in a way that excludes the co-owner, that lies at the heart of that crime. Therefore, even if it is true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130272 - 2014-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
be Robert’s contested testimony that Anne lied.[1] The issue, therefore, is whether Robert’s testimony would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
be Robert’s contested testimony that Anne lied.[1] The issue, therefore, is whether Robert’s testimony would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, however, lies within No. 2009AP1797 4 the circuit court’s sound discretion. Welytok, 312
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52539 - 2014-09-15
, however, lies within No. 2009AP1797 4 the circuit court’s sound discretion. Welytok, 312
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52539 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald M. Vales
that Henry had lied in her initial statements to the police. Vales specifically faulted counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10065 - 2017-09-19
that Henry had lied in her initial statements to the police. Vales specifically faulted counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10065 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brett E. Alford
to Alford’s initial inculpatory statement to the police, but also noted that he lied when he gave his reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
to Alford’s initial inculpatory statement to the police, but also noted that he lied when he gave his reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
post-revocation. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111770 - 2014-05-06
post-revocation. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong policy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111770 - 2014-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
factor at sentencing. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104267 - 2013-11-12
factor at sentencing. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104267 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Billie T. Hill
-2- STANDARD OF REVIEW Sentencing lies within the trial court's discretion, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8256 - 2017-09-19
-2- STANDARD OF REVIEW Sentencing lies within the trial court's discretion, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8256 - 2017-09-19
Patricia Laux v. County of Waupaca
and cooked up a story and the state trooper lied, even though [he] could probably get fired for falsifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12495 - 2005-03-31
and cooked up a story and the state trooper lied, even though [he] could probably get fired for falsifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
in the no merit report: whether the trial court misused its sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
in the no merit report: whether the trial court misused its sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19