Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 6665 for mix.

State v. Frederick B. Rogers
counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4316 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernard A. Graef
of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 6. Trial counsel's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10061 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gerald D. Taylor
sentence. ¶12 In reviewing this issue our standard is mixed; we review historical facts under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7102 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress. The review of a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382135 - 2021-06-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
See Glendenning’s Limestone & Ready-Mix Co. v. Reimer, 2006 WI App 161, ¶14, 295 Wis. 2d 556, 721
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13

[PDF] State v. Charlotte Kotlov
(quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). The issues of performance and prejudice present mixed questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11545 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the relief requested is subject to a mixed standard of review. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. 1998). We apply a mixed standard of review to these types of determinations. See id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 675, 729 N.W.2d 182 (citation omitted). We review questions of constitutional fact under a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36896 - 2009-06-23

COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry are mixed questions of law and fact.” Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142619 - 2015-06-02