Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 6430 for wide.

COURT OF APPEALS
must indulge a strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06

COURT OF APPEALS
must show counsel’s specific acts or omissions were “outside the wide range of professionally competent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15

[PDF] State v. Dennis C. Marth
if it falls below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id., ¶19. This standard encompasses a wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5075 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
….” Schulman’s description of the roadway indicates that Kearney Avenue was wide enough for two lanes of traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36807 - 2009-06-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the wide range of professionally competent assistance. Id. at 690. The reasonableness of counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204727 - 2017-12-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
., ¶15, the information that the police were able to confirm was widely available, and the informant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28500 - 2007-03-20

Patrick Hagenbucher v. Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company
, six hundred feet long, twelve to fourteen feet wide, and three to four feet high, because it blended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joshua J. Alderman
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John L. Griffin
prosecutors have wide charging discretion, that discretion is “subject to the independent authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11542 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael G.
has wide discretion in deciding what is in the child's best interests. State ex rel. Hannon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8708 - 2017-09-19