Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
LaVerne Swanson v. Ronald W. Nelson
the verdict is a question of law we review de novo. See Weiss v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 197 Wis.2d 365, 388
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10954 - 2017-09-19
the verdict is a question of law we review de novo. See Weiss v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 197 Wis.2d 365, 388
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10954 - 2017-09-19
William B. Diel v. State of Wisconsin-Labor and Industry Review Commission
the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel contests LIRC’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2780 - 2005-03-31
the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel contests LIRC’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2780 - 2005-03-31
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14472 - 2005-03-31
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14472 - 2005-03-31
Aaron Ben Woods v. Kenneth Morgan
action, we apply a de novo standard to issues of law. See State ex rel. McMillian v. Dickey, 132 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13514 - 2005-03-31
action, we apply a de novo standard to issues of law. See State ex rel. McMillian v. Dickey, 132 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 713 N.W.2d 152. Ordinarily, our review of the application and interpretation of a statute de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107790 - 2017-09-21
, 713 N.W.2d 152. Ordinarily, our review of the application and interpretation of a statute de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107790 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy L. Olson
for a sentence credit. Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit is an issue we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14052 - 2005-03-31
for a sentence credit. Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit is an issue we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Dulin
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
statute was proper is based on a de novo review. State v. Anderson, 141 Wis.2d 653, 658, 416 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
statute was proper is based on a de novo review. State v. Anderson, 141 Wis.2d 653, 658, 416 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
discussion below. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81567 - 2012-04-25
discussion below. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81567 - 2012-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Giminski, 247 Wis. 2d 750, ¶11. ¶13 A defendant may claim “necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91502 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. Giminski, 247 Wis. 2d 750, ¶11. ¶13 A defendant may claim “necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91502 - 2014-09-15