Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 40198 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 40198 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
State v. Morris F. Clement
was based in part on a written statement by Clement’s probation agent: “[a] statement by Agent Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5969 - 2005-03-31
was based in part on a written statement by Clement’s probation agent: “[a] statement by Agent Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5969 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
that allows “audiovisual recording of an oral statement of a child who is available to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
that allows “audiovisual recording of an oral statement of a child who is available to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
State v. Matthew Tyler
). Some examples of the alleged improper remarks include the prosecutor’s statements that: This boils
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13121 - 2005-03-31
). Some examples of the alleged improper remarks include the prosecutor’s statements that: This boils
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13121 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley G. Baker
statement to be admitted even though the declarant is available as a witness when the statement is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7977 - 2005-03-31
statement to be admitted even though the declarant is available as a witness when the statement is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley G. Baker
statement to be admitted even though the declarant is available as a witness when the statement is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7977 - 2017-09-19
statement to be admitted even though the declarant is available as a witness when the statement is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7977 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott Kiekhefer
it denied his motion to No. 96-2052-CR 2 suppress statements made to the police prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11123 - 2017-09-19
it denied his motion to No. 96-2052-CR 2 suppress statements made to the police prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11123 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. A. S.
cause, and (2) that A.S.'s statements were not protected speech under the First Amendment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17545 - 2017-09-21
cause, and (2) that A.S.'s statements were not protected speech under the First Amendment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17545 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott Kiekhefer
motion to suppress statements made to the police prior to receiving his Miranda[1] warnings, the physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11123 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress statements made to the police prior to receiving his Miranda[1] warnings, the physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11123 - 2005-03-31