Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). At the postconviction motion hearing, Hazel Washington, Jackson’s trial lawyer, testified that she remembered the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175368 - 2017-09-21
). At the postconviction motion hearing, Hazel Washington, Jackson’s trial lawyer, testified that she remembered the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William D. Taylor
on appeal is whether Taylor received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because Taylor failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3823 - 2017-09-20
on appeal is whether Taylor received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because Taylor failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3823 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Thorp argues he was deprived of his due process rights when the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
for postconviction relief. Thorp argues he was deprived of his due process rights when the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The case proceeded to trial and a jury convicted Gray of the charge. The trial court sentenced him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223942 - 2018-10-22
. The case proceeded to trial and a jury convicted Gray of the charge. The trial court sentenced him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223942 - 2018-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Marshall R. Reese
for postconviction relief. Reese claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. Reese claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e). The matter proceeded to trial, and a jury found Rashada guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228634 - 2018-11-21
WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e). The matter proceeded to trial, and a jury found Rashada guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228634 - 2018-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
following foreclosure. The trial court denied Tri City’s claim for equitable subrogation and granted first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
following foreclosure. The trial court denied Tri City’s claim for equitable subrogation and granted first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
2009 WI APP 177
Incarceration Program (CIP) despite the trial court’s determination at sentencing that Schladweiler was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
Incarceration Program (CIP) despite the trial court’s determination at sentencing that Schladweiler was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation because she: (1) did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
claims that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation because she: (1) did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
[PDF]
State v. Charles L., Sr.
to terminate his parental rights, the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19042 - 2017-09-21
to terminate his parental rights, the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19042 - 2017-09-21