Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12611 - 12620 of 16127 for search.

[PDF] PPAC Court Security Subcommittee - "State of Security" in Wisconsin Circuit Courts Report
to the courtroom through a secured corridor  55% of rooms are not searched prior to use  49% of rooms
/courts/committees/docs/ppacstateofsecurityrpt.pdf - 2010-11-29

[PDF] IN RE THE MATTER OF JURY TRIALS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. ¶3 Informed
/news/docs/jurytrials1.pdf - 2020-03-22

[PDF] Communicating the value of an independent judiciary
of the judiciary soars like the American eagle today. Type in judicial activism on the your Internet search
/publications/reports/docs/fleishauerspeech05.pdf - 2009-11-17

[PDF] Brown County v. Marsha A.G.
- It is the appellate court's duty to search the record for credible evidence to sustain the jury verdict. Id. at 306
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11647 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary decisions and may, when necessary, search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738566 - 2023-12-13

[PDF] State v. Matthew T. Doughty
and was subjected to having his mail searched and [he was] prohibited from leaving the facility.” Doughty thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6617 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by the Constitution,’ such as the right to refuse a warrantless, unreasonable search.” Forrett, 401 Wis. 2d 678, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001747 - 2025-08-28

Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
reasoning in reaching a discretionary decision, this court will search the record for reasons to sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
violations. Id., ¶4. After the business of the routine traffic stop was concluded, the officer searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61908 - 2011-03-28

Evelyn Hommrich v. Allan Rittenhouse
. See Fahrenberg v. Tengel, 96 Wis. 2d 211, 231, 291 N.W.2d 516 (1980). A reviewing court must search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15272 - 2005-03-31