Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12611 - 12620 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 12611 - 12620 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Somers
were instituted by the wrong governmental entity; (2) the trial court lost personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
were instituted by the wrong governmental entity; (2) the trial court lost personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of all the charges. The trial court sentenced Johnson to a cumulative sentence of thirty years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252156 - 2020-01-06
of all the charges. The trial court sentenced Johnson to a cumulative sentence of thirty years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252156 - 2020-01-06
State v. Marshall R. Reese
claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer was ineffective; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
claims that: (1) the State destroyed exculpatory evidence; (2) his trial lawyer was ineffective; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
WI APP 177
in the Challenge No. 2008AP3119-CR 2 Incarceration Program (CIP) despite the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43013 - 2014-09-15
in the Challenge No. 2008AP3119-CR 2 Incarceration Program (CIP) despite the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43013 - 2014-09-15
State v. Charles L., Sr.
if there were grounds to terminate his parental rights, the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19042 - 2005-07-18
if there were grounds to terminate his parental rights, the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19042 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues he was deprived of his due process rights when the trial court failed to conduct an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38341 - 2014-09-15
argues he was deprived of his due process rights when the trial court failed to conduct an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 STARK, J.1 Kevin Lee Wilke, pro se, appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
. ¶1 STARK, J.1 Kevin Lee Wilke, pro se, appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
State v. Norman R.
a bench trial terminating their parental rights to Lucas R., Christian R., and Sean R. We affirm.[1] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
a bench trial terminating their parental rights to Lucas R., Christian R., and Sean R. We affirm.[1] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Starks argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel for a variety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62848 - 2011-04-13
for postconviction relief. Starks argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel for a variety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62848 - 2011-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
received ineffective assistance of trial counsel for a variety of reasons, that the prosecutor engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62848 - 2014-09-15
received ineffective assistance of trial counsel for a variety of reasons, that the prosecutor engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62848 - 2014-09-15