Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12621 - 12630 of 67070 for ct.
Search results 12621 - 12630 of 67070 for ct.
County of Columbia v. Cheryl Linde-Ray
. Appeal No. 02-0535 Cir. Ct. No. 00-TR-1649 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4987 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 02-0535 Cir. Ct. No. 00-TR-1649 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2010AP2948-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF3707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72992 - 2014-09-15
WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2010AP2948-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF3707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72992 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Cooper
600, 499 N.W.2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993), for the proposition that de novo review is the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10574 - 2017-09-20
600, 499 N.W.2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993), for the proposition that de novo review is the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10574 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William J. Church
, 589 N.W.2d 638 (Ct. App. 1998-Published) Opinion Filed: July 11, 2000 Submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17318 - 2017-09-21
, 589 N.W.2d 638 (Ct. App. 1998-Published) Opinion Filed: July 11, 2000 Submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Bolstad
reversal makes this issue moot. Diamond v. Ruszkiewicz, 212 Wis.2d 143, 146, 567 N.W.2d 649, 652 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13524 - 2017-09-21
reversal makes this issue moot. Diamond v. Ruszkiewicz, 212 Wis.2d 143, 146, 567 N.W.2d 649, 652 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13524 - 2017-09-21
State v. John E. Lowther III
the enhancement. See State v. Koeppen, 195 Wis.2d 117, 127, 536 N.W.2d 386, 390 (Ct. App. 1995). The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10984 - 2005-03-31
the enhancement. See State v. Koeppen, 195 Wis.2d 117, 127, 536 N.W.2d 386, 390 (Ct. App. 1995). The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2011AP2634 Cir. Ct. No. 2011SC30149 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83924 - 2012-06-25
. Appeal No. 2011AP2634 Cir. Ct. No. 2011SC30149 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83924 - 2012-06-25
[PDF]
Peterson v. Anne Gerard
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0927 Cir. Ct. No. 01SC029982 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6350 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0927 Cir. Ct. No. 01SC029982 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6350 - 2017-09-19
State v. Teranika H.
572, 590 N.W.2d 276 (Ct. App. 1998), the court erred. The State responds that it is in “substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31
572, 590 N.W.2d 276 (Ct. App. 1998), the court erred. The State responds that it is in “substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2011AP2099 Cir. Ct. No. 2010ME37B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77241 - 2014-09-15
WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2011AP2099 Cir. Ct. No. 2010ME37B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77241 - 2014-09-15