Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12621 - 12630 of 30117 for de.
Search results 12621 - 12630 of 30117 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123397 - 2014-10-07
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123397 - 2014-10-07
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
determination of whether the trial court’s interpretation of the statute was proper is based on a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11605 - 2005-03-31
determination of whether the trial court’s interpretation of the statute was proper is based on a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11605 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). On appeal, the court of appeals reviews de novo whether the circuit court properly interpreted the insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101773 - 2013-09-10
). On appeal, the court of appeals reviews de novo whether the circuit court properly interpreted the insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101773 - 2013-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶3 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123397 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶3 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123397 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark G. Willard
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18920 - 2005-07-12
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18920 - 2005-07-12
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
under a de novo standard of review. See State v. Hajicek, 2001 WI 3, ¶15, 240 Wis. 2d 349, 620 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21
under a de novo standard of review. See State v. Hajicek, 2001 WI 3, ¶15, 240 Wis. 2d 349, 620 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s summary judgment decisions de novo, “applying the same method employed by the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727118 - 2023-11-15
court’s summary judgment decisions de novo, “applying the same method employed by the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727118 - 2023-11-15
Michael P. Shea v. Village of Brown Deer Police Commission
a de novo review, to take testimony, or to make its own credibility determinations. The court, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14259 - 2005-03-31
a de novo review, to take testimony, or to make its own credibility determinations. The court, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14259 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on both aspects of the Strickland test are matters that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26
on both aspects of the Strickland test are matters that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26