Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12621 - 12630 of 64076 for records/1000.
Search results 12621 - 12630 of 64076 for records/1000.
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether he shows remorse. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether he shows remorse. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record shows a stipulated payment plan, he was never a party to it and never authorized an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108576 - 2017-09-21
that the record shows a stipulated payment plan, he was never a party to it and never authorized an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108576 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
for sentence modification. The circuit court issued an order on February 15, 2005, amending the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26962 - 2006-10-30
for sentence modification. The circuit court issued an order on February 15, 2005, amending the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26962 - 2006-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
State v. Steven J. Zack
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2005-03-31
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102963 - 2017-09-21
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102963 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied the motion, concluding the record conclusively demonstrates that Robles-Figueroa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court denied the motion, concluding the record conclusively demonstrates that Robles-Figueroa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21