Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12631 - 12640 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 12631 - 12640 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
a new factor warranting sentence modification under common law. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
a new factor warranting sentence modification under common law. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
a new factor warranting sentence modification under common law. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
a new factor warranting sentence modification under common law. See State v. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d 544
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
evidence that a new factor exists that would warrant sentence modification. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10262 - 2017-09-20
evidence that a new factor exists that would warrant sentence modification. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10262 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
factor that would warrant sentence modification. A new factor is a fact highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31422 - 2014-09-15
factor that would warrant sentence modification. A new factor is a fact highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31422 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
injustice warranting plea withdrawal. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478279 - 2022-02-01
injustice warranting plea withdrawal. See State v. Johnson, 2012 WI App 21, ¶12, 339 Wis. 2d 421, 811
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478279 - 2022-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
was warranted. See id., ¶38 (if court determines there is no new factor as a matter of law, it need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102466 - 2013-09-30
was warranted. See id., ¶38 (if court determines there is no new factor as a matter of law, it need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102466 - 2013-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
was “‘unduly harsh or unconscionable,’” or if the movant shows the existence of a new factor that warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
was “‘unduly harsh or unconscionable,’” or if the movant shows the existence of a new factor that warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
CA Blank Order
of the circumstances, a reasonably prudent officer would be warranted in the belief that the suspect might be armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103211 - 2013-10-16
of the circumstances, a reasonably prudent officer would be warranted in the belief that the suspect might be armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103211 - 2013-10-16
State v. Shawn R. Coleman
court. Whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence rests within the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8679 - 2005-03-31
court. Whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence rests within the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8679 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
stop if “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44406 - 2009-12-07
stop if “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44406 - 2009-12-07