Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12631 - 12640 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12631 - 12640 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. Dennis H.
of law this court reviews de novo. K.N.K., 139 Wis. 2d at 198. ¶10 To succeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7609 - 2005-03-31
of law this court reviews de novo. K.N.K., 139 Wis. 2d at 198. ¶10 To succeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7609 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark L. Stewart
subject to de novo review. Id., ¶10. ¶7 In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
subject to de novo review. Id., ¶10. ¶7 In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statutory offer of judgment de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis. 2d 610, 624, 557 N.W.2d 487 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65817 - 2011-06-14
of a statutory offer of judgment de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis. 2d 610, 624, 557 N.W.2d 487 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65817 - 2011-06-14
State v. Paul L. Minnig
” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61.[2] This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31
” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61.[2] This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31
Ramiro Estrada v. State
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
State v. Turnel W. Smith
, § 946.42, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12016 - 2005-03-31
, § 946.42, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12016 - 2005-03-31
St. Croix County v. Adam Douglas Cress
constitutional rights is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
constitutional rights is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 28
, statutory construction is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
, statutory construction is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
State v. Stanley R. Scott
, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. In State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. In State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31