Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12631 - 12640 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] State v. Kevin Brown
court’s order denying the motion was “the law of the case,” and that Brown had abandoned his appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] William A. Krieger v. Thomas G. Borgen
, and (3) the person must show that there is no other adequate remedy available in the law. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6966 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
federal, and state laws, and local alcohol, drug, and violence ordinances during the period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840522 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
of all of your employees including your law enforcement officers.” The sheriff denied the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a question of law that we consider de novo, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75106 - 2012-01-02

State v. Renee A. Fredel
the benefits of having a second chemical test performed as required by the implied consent law, § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial and “the law prefers less drastic alternatives, if available and practical.” Id. (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35733 - 2009-03-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72109 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Mark R. Lowe
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment, however, presents a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3907 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
an individual has twice been placed in jeopardy in violation of art. I, § 8, is a question of law we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14775 - 2017-09-21