Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 68167 for law.

[PDF] Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
on three occasions.” A law enforcement officer may lawfully conduct an investigatory stop if, based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5899 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Anthony D. Gritz
count. Gritz now appeals. DISCUSSION Verbal Challenges to Law Enforcement Gritz first contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we consider de novo, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75106 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
“examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72109 - 2011-10-11

William Farina v. Meridian Group, Inc.
to the court, the defendant may move to dismiss “on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12915 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
: "As a matter of logic and case law, a party can have one right, but not the other." Jerome does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12999 - 2017-09-21

Kinko's, Inc. v. Craig Shuler
of Kinko’s trade secrets and confidential information violated common law and contractual duties. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4363 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
protect citizens against unreasonable seizures. 4 It is reasonable, and hence lawful, for law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174954 - 2017-09-21

James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
and rejected General Casualty’s argument that Wis. Stat. § 632.32(5)(f) changed the law governing primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Under Brown, if the defendant is not responsible for the mistake of law, the defendant has the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07