Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 15544 for probate.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 15544 for probate.
[PDF]
WI APP 113
three years’ concurrent probation on the forgery- uttering charge. No. 2009AP1822-CR 4 ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51759 - 2014-09-15
three years’ concurrent probation on the forgery- uttering charge. No. 2009AP1822-CR 4 ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51759 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on an adult person or places an adult person on probation, regardless of whether any fine is imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180506 - 2017-09-21
on an adult person or places an adult person on probation, regardless of whether any fine is imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of probation, concurrent to each other but consecutive to Nederhoff’s sentence on Count 1. Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733555 - 2023-11-28
of probation, concurrent to each other but consecutive to Nederhoff’s sentence on Count 1. Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733555 - 2023-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
) that Pentinmaki had been placed on probation following his 1992 conviction for failure to support; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
) that Pentinmaki had been placed on probation following his 1992 conviction for failure to support; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
State v. Brian K. Rundle
told Rundle that she did not trust the Elk Mound police chief or Rundle’s probation officer because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13805 - 2005-03-31
told Rundle that she did not trust the Elk Mound police chief or Rundle’s probation officer because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13805 - 2005-03-31
State v. James J. Kempinski
with the victim. The court sentenced Kempinski to thirty years in prison and thirty years of probation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
with the victim. The court sentenced Kempinski to thirty years in prison and thirty years of probation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15523 - 2017-09-21
in the sixth case, with five years probation. Huck filed postconviction motions in each case alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15523 - 2017-09-21