Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 63909 for records/1000.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 63909 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
being charged – they come after me with the past record. THE COURT: You have no past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
being charged – they come after me with the past record. THE COURT: You have no past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 948.07(1). 1 Steen has responded. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181257 - 2017-09-21
. § 948.07(1). 1 Steen has responded. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488640 - 2022-03-02
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488640 - 2022-03-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100065 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100065 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132592 - 2017-09-21
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or resentencing. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262670 - 2020-06-02
or resentencing. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262670 - 2020-06-02
Anthony J. Bogdanovich v. Town of Three Lakes Board of Supervisors
lacked discretion under Wis. Stat. § 80.13[1] to deny the application, that the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2977 - 2005-03-31
lacked discretion under Wis. Stat. § 80.13[1] to deny the application, that the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116719 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189654 - 2017-09-21
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189654 - 2017-09-21