Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12651 - 12660 of 65273 for or b.
Search results 12651 - 12660 of 65273 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2013-14). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172226 - 2017-09-21
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2013-14). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 considered at sentencing.” Under § 973.20(2)(b), the restitution order may require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253606 - 2020-02-05
3 considered at sentencing.” Under § 973.20(2)(b), the restitution order may require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253606 - 2020-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(3), 939.50(3)(g), and 973.01(2)(b)7. (2013-14). On the exposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13
supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(3), 939.50(3)(g), and 973.01(2)(b)7. (2013-14). On the exposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13
Suzanne Kristo v. GRE Insurance Group
or reversal of the trial court’s judgment. See § 809.10(1)(b), Stats. In the absence of a cross-appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11429 - 2005-03-31
or reversal of the trial court’s judgment. See § 809.10(1)(b), Stats. In the absence of a cross-appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11429 - 2005-03-31
State v. Collin D. Jones
)(a) and (3)(b), Stats. In exchange for Jones’s guilty plea, the State dropped the repeater allegation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11415 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and (3)(b), Stats. In exchange for Jones’s guilty plea, the State dropped the repeater allegation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11415 - 2005-03-31
04-09 Amendment of the Rules of Evidence: Wis. Stat. ss 908.03(6), 909.02(12) & 909.02(13) (Effective January 1, 2006)
as a regular practice. (b) A party intending to offer a record into evidence under par. (a) must provide
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20101 - 2005-10-27
as a regular practice. (b) A party intending to offer a record into evidence under par. (a) must provide
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20101 - 2005-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. Nash Finch Company, Defendant, Thrifty Drug Stores, Inc. d/b/a Thrifty White Drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28460 - 2007-03-14
. Nash Finch Company, Defendant, Thrifty Drug Stores, Inc. d/b/a Thrifty White Drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28460 - 2007-03-14
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
neglect, citing WIS. STAT. § 345.37(1)(b), which states: If the defendant moves to open the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5112 - 2017-09-19
neglect, citing WIS. STAT. § 345.37(1)(b), which states: If the defendant moves to open the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5112 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
fifteen-year probation, stating that it did not know whether Barnstable had undergone a conversion, “[b]ut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28978 - 2007-05-14
fifteen-year probation, stating that it did not know whether Barnstable had undergone a conversion, “[b]ut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28978 - 2007-05-14
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
charge] case where the defendant filed the 32-B.[1] Because there was solid proof of Malkmus's prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
charge] case where the defendant filed the 32-B.[1] Because there was solid proof of Malkmus's prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31