Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12661 - 12670 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12661 - 12670 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123397 - 2014-10-07
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123397 - 2014-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Robert Fecke
is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 697, 551
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21
and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 697, 551
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Fethiye F. Uygur v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.
303, 306-07, 552 N.W.2d 632 (1996). ¶8 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16170 - 2017-09-21
303, 306-07, 552 N.W.2d 632 (1996). ¶8 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16170 - 2017-09-21
Wood County Dept. of Social Services v. Mabel R.
review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶8 We conclude that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19427 - 2005-08-24
review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶8 We conclude that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19427 - 2005-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Zeilinger
the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. ¶7 The State does not dispute that the informant’s tip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6104 - 2017-09-19
the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. ¶7 The State does not dispute that the informant’s tip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2010AP1732 4 ¶6 We review the validity of a statutory offer of judgment de novo. See Staehler v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65817 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2010AP1732 4 ¶6 We review the validity of a statutory offer of judgment de novo. See Staehler v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65817 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
. The interpretation of a document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20
. The interpretation of a document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
10AP2995 County of Sheboygan v. Jeffrey L. Bubolz.doc
. The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62146 - 2011-04-05
. The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62146 - 2011-04-05