Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12661 - 12670 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 12661 - 12670 of 33987 for dismissed.
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
felony. A second count of misdemeanor battery was dismissed, but reserved to be read in at sentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
felony. A second count of misdemeanor battery was dismissed, but reserved to be read in at sentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
Guy Riccitelli, M.D. v. Fredrik Broekhuizen, M.D.
. Following the dismissal of Dr. Riccitelli’s request for an injunction, the Committee terminated him from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17360 - 2005-03-31
. Following the dismissal of Dr. Riccitelli’s request for an injunction, the Committee terminated him from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17360 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
that Perfection had violated the DTPA. ¶12 After the close of K&S’s evidence, Perfection moved to dismiss on two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29352 - 2007-06-11
that Perfection had violated the DTPA. ¶12 After the close of K&S’s evidence, Perfection moved to dismiss on two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29352 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
WI App 62
price. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Simplicity, dismissing the Birges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012075 - 2025-11-20
price. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Simplicity, dismissing the Birges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012075 - 2025-11-20
[PDF]
Joan A. German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
). The court of appeals affirmed an order of the circuit court denying DOT's motion to dismiss a wage claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17356 - 2017-09-21
). The court of appeals affirmed an order of the circuit court denying DOT's motion to dismiss a wage claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17356 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court with directions to vacate both adjudications and dismiss the delinquency petition.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21
court with directions to vacate both adjudications and dismiss the delinquency petition.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
WI 59
dismissing the Hockings' suit. I. BACKGROUND ¶4 The following facts are undisputed for the purposes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51661 - 2014-09-15
dismissing the Hockings' suit. I. BACKGROUND ¶4 The following facts are undisputed for the purposes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dale R. Rapey
; and (4) failure to move for dismissal at the close of the State’s case or at the conclusion of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12021 - 2017-09-21
; and (4) failure to move for dismissal at the close of the State’s case or at the conclusion of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12021 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
alleged in Count 24; however, he recommended dismissal of Counts 21, 22, and 23 for lack of proof
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48993 - 2010-04-13
alleged in Count 24; however, he recommended dismissal of Counts 21, 22, and 23 for lack of proof
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48993 - 2010-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Burrow moved for summary judgment, asserting in pertinent part that they are entitled to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204650 - 2017-12-11
, and Burrow moved for summary judgment, asserting in pertinent part that they are entitled to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204650 - 2017-12-11