Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12661 - 12670 of 68911 for he.
Search results 12661 - 12670 of 68911 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, of various offenses, all as a repeater and many as acts of domestic abuse. He also appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
, of various offenses, all as a repeater and many as acts of domestic abuse. He also appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
Ramsden and Thistlewood. He alleged that Thistlewood and Ramsden were negligent, and that Thistlewood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71457 - 2011-09-26
Ramsden and Thistlewood. He alleged that Thistlewood and Ramsden were negligent, and that Thistlewood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71457 - 2011-09-26
State v. Lawrence A. Williams
is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when he consented to the search. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16479 - 2005-03-31
is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when he consented to the search. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misdemeanors, all as domestic abuse violations. He also appeals the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265318 - 2020-06-23
misdemeanors, all as domestic abuse violations. He also appeals the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265318 - 2020-06-23
State v. Antwon C. Mathews
is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when he consented to the search. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16480 - 2005-03-31
is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when he consented to the search. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16480 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose DeJesus Fuentes
., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) he was prejudiced by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12508 - 2005-03-31
., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) he was prejudiced by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12508 - 2005-03-31
WI App 2 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2154 Complete Title of ...
ejaculation (Count 6), all by use of force. Prineas did not dispute that he had sexual intercourse with KAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75165 - 2012-01-24
ejaculation (Count 6), all by use of force. Prineas did not dispute that he had sexual intercourse with KAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75165 - 2012-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jail; having a computer at his residence with several SD memory cards containing pornography that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22
jail; having a computer at his residence with several SD memory cards containing pornography that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
imprisonment, and an order denying his postconviction motions.1 Sterling argues that: (1) he was deprived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49634 - 2014-09-15
imprisonment, and an order denying his postconviction motions.1 Sterling argues that: (1) he was deprived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49634 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2010AP1512 4 against Ramsden and Thistlewood. He alleged that Thistlewood and Ramsden were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71457 - 2014-09-15
No. 2010AP1512 4 against Ramsden and Thistlewood. He alleged that Thistlewood and Ramsden were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71457 - 2014-09-15