Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12671 - 12680 of 30137 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constituted a breach and whether that breach was material and substantial, questions of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103931 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Debra L. Van Riper
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Norda, Inc. v. Wisconsin Educational Approval Board
the injunction and the declaratory judgment. The Board appeals. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert E. Irish
), STATS.3 The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
inaccurate. 2 See State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106, ¶46, 313 Wis. 2d 39, 756 N.W.2d 423. We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220074 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] State v. Rodney Calhoun
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the deficiency prong. ¶8 Whether trial counsel performed deficiently is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240499 - 2019-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140563 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34436 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶13 Smith does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212987 - 2018-05-23