Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12671 - 12680 of 49816 for our.
Search results 12671 - 12680 of 49816 for our.
Wisconsin Court System - State Law Library - Contact the Reference Desk
from 8:00 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., Monday through Friday. Our goal is to respond to your e-mail within 24
/courts/offices/wsllcontact.htm - 2025-12-30
from 8:00 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., Monday through Friday. Our goal is to respond to your e-mail within 24
/courts/offices/wsllcontact.htm - 2025-12-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. On our de novo review, we conclude that sufficient plausible evidence existed to find probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80921 - 2012-04-17
for reconsideration. On our de novo review, we conclude that sufficient plausible evidence existed to find probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80921 - 2012-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Luecke pleaded guilty and was convicted. This appeal follows. ¶5 Our review of an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116672 - 2017-09-21
.” Luecke pleaded guilty and was convicted. This appeal follows. ¶5 Our review of an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116672 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration of that order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
motion for reconsideration of that order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
2 RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in sentencing him. As our review of the record satisfies us that the no-merit report properly and thoroughly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228785 - 2018-11-28
in sentencing him. As our review of the record satisfies us that the no-merit report properly and thoroughly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228785 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
would be as it relates to the post- revocation sentencing. Our review of a sentence determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155106 - 2017-09-21
would be as it relates to the post- revocation sentencing. Our review of a sentence determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155106 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58803 - 2014-09-15
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerald J. McDowell
) received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10604 - 2017-09-20
) received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10604 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35259 - 2014-09-15
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35259 - 2014-09-15