Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12671 - 12680 of 64084 for records/1000.
Search results 12671 - 12680 of 64084 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Brandon Hill v. Patricia A. Butler
portion of the record that explains the facts of this case is the sparse pleadings filed in small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6362 - 2017-09-19
portion of the record that explains the facts of this case is the sparse pleadings filed in small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6362 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
official record. However, Knapp did not object to the alleged error in the report, and therefore he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
official record. However, Knapp did not object to the alleged error in the report, and therefore he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick C. Webster
hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin Criminal Investigation Bureau (WCIB) showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13370 - 2005-03-31
hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin Criminal Investigation Bureau (WCIB) showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13370 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
State v. Steven J. Zack
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2005-03-31
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601151 - 2022-12-15
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601151 - 2022-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210357 - 2018-03-27
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210357 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
investigation (PSI) and the State. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209394 - 2018-03-06
investigation (PSI) and the State. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209394 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418411 - 2021-09-01
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418411 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
WI 28
The record from the hearing on the motion to vacate the default judgment reflects that the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94787 - 2014-09-15
The record from the hearing on the motion to vacate the default judgment reflects that the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94787 - 2014-09-15