Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 50100 for our.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Our review of the Record satisfies us that the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620614 - 2023-02-15
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Our review of the Record satisfies us that the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620614 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of its sentencing discretion; and (3) the performance of trial counsel. Our review of the appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
of its sentencing discretion; and (3) the performance of trial counsel. Our review of the appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
the circuit court construed as a motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24).1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument and no citations to legal authority, a violation of our appellate rules. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231338 - 2018-12-28
argument and no citations to legal authority, a violation of our appellate rules. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231338 - 2018-12-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. See State v. Douangmala, 2002 WI 62, ¶23, 253 Wis. 2d 173, 646 N.W.2d 1; see also § 971.08(2). Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98374 - 2014-09-15
. See State v. Douangmala, 2002 WI 62, ¶23, 253 Wis. 2d 173, 646 N.W.2d 1; see also § 971.08(2). Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98374 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be given to each factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
to be given to each factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 99, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). ¶10 Although our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41537 - 2009-09-28
.” State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 99, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). ¶10 Although our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41537 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
Lawrence H. DeClerc v. Bellin Memorial Hospital
that disposes of plaintiff's claim, the rule is satisfied. Our application of this statute is consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14793 - 2017-09-21
that disposes of plaintiff's claim, the rule is satisfied. Our application of this statute is consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14793 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585612 - 2022-11-01
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585612 - 2022-11-01