Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
to administer the preliminary breath test. He also argues the court should be reversed because it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
to administer the preliminary breath test. He also argues the court should be reversed because it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
field sobriety tests as consciousness of guilt when the failure to take the tests resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
field sobriety tests as consciousness of guilt when the failure to take the tests resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Costigan
statements, observations of the officer, and the results of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8904 - 2017-09-19
statements, observations of the officer, and the results of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8904 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant to Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant to Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael G. Costigan
of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed by the trial court. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed by the trial court. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
Ozaukee County v. Perry P. Lieuallen
Ozaukee county to Waukesha county. Second, he asserts that, in addition to the breath test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15346 - 2005-03-31
Ozaukee county to Waukesha county. Second, he asserts that, in addition to the breath test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15346 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31509 - 2014-10-13
suppressed the results of his breath test because the Informing the Accused form read to him pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31509 - 2014-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Edgars Osis
the heel-to-toe test, first showing him how to do it. As instructed, Osis said he took the nine steps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11815 - 2017-09-21
the heel-to-toe test, first showing him how to do it. As instructed, Osis said he took the nine steps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Steffes
is still entitled to a hearing on whether he refused to submit to a test. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14807 - 2017-09-21
is still entitled to a hearing on whether he refused to submit to a test. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14807 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas J. Miller
of a chemical test of his blood. Specifically, Miller contends that the police were required to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
of a chemical test of his blood. Specifically, Miller contends that the police were required to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19