Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 18355 for re.

State v. Randy J. Netzer
eight months and re-file a nearly identical motion. As we have noted, Netzer did not pursue a “direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6108 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
In re the estate of Floyd Heck: Sheldon Heck, Appellant, v. Estate of Floyd Heck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103684 - 2013-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100241 - 2017-09-21

Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
business, the statutory maximum of $10,000 for re-establishment expenses, and actual and reasonable moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13

COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT II In re the marriage of: Nancy H. Roush, Petitioner-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36802 - 2009-06-16

[PDF] State v. Kenneth R. Schewe
a trial court function, not an appellate function. See In re Estate of Dejmal, 95 Wis.2d 141, 151-52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11695 - 2017-09-20

State v. James D. Minniecheske
by the state constitution, not by legislative acts. In re B.J.N., 162 Wis.2d 635, 655-56, 469 N.W.2d 845, 853
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14015 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 42
“must be applied toward Obriecht’s re-confinement time as a matter of fairness and to assure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109611 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO A. H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597208 - 2022-12-06

[PDF] Shirley Yvonne Robinson v. Gordon Charles Robinson
DISTRICT III IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: SHIRLEY YVONNE ROBINSON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-CROSS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3296 - 2017-09-19