Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 12681 - 12690 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Jeffrey J. Beardsley
different theories: (1) the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence of a previous armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10596 - 2005-03-31
different theories: (1) the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence of a previous armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10596 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chad D. Everts
as a habitual offender and from a trial 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
as a habitual offender and from a trial 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
State v. Arlando Palmore
) the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for precharging/prearrest delay; (2) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12977 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for precharging/prearrest delay; (2) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12977 - 2005-03-31
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
subcontractors in a dispute over the installation of window frames. Aluminum claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
subcontractors in a dispute over the installation of window frames. Aluminum claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority v. Robert W. Stanek
of the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA). The Staneks argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
of the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA). The Staneks argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sought a new trial based on nine claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. As noted, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161768 - 2017-09-21
sought a new trial based on nine claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. As noted, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sexual assault of a child, D.T. On the scheduled trial date, D.T.’s mother and D.T. did not appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249521 - 2019-10-30
sexual assault of a child, D.T. On the scheduled trial date, D.T.’s mother and D.T. did not appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249521 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Culpepper argues that (1) his trial counsel ineffectively represented him by failing to call two alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
Culpepper argues that (1) his trial counsel ineffectively represented him by failing to call two alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel on several grounds. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel on several grounds. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92069 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel. We reject Paulson’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89579 - 2014-09-15
trial counsel. We reject Paulson’s arguments and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89579 - 2014-09-15

