Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12691 - 12700 of 30115 for de.

Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
standard presents a legal question generally subject to de novo review, according deference to LIRC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lynn A. Soto v. Jose A. Soto
cannot use property division as an equitable means to award de facto maintenance. This contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14433 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Pleasant Prairie v. Maureen M. McCarragher
disputed question (reasonable suspicion) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5989 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
granted summary judgment is a question of law for our de novo review. Belding II, 2014 WI 8, ¶13, 352
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112092 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jesse J. Rabas
and statutory principles to these facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2823 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient representation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d at 266-67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89675 - 2012-11-26

[PDF] Susan K. Kampinen v. Donald C. Bierman
the application of statutes to undisputed facts, all are questions of law subject to de novo review. See Rock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16298 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 21
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28172 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
been denied this right is a question of law we review de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9; see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06

2006 WI APP 197
of law that we review de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244 Wis. 2d 582, 628 N.W.2d 820. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26528 - 2006-10-30