Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12691 - 12700 of 58445 for speedy trial.
Search results 12691 - 12700 of 58445 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Culpepper argues that (1) his trial counsel ineffectively represented him by failing to call two alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
Culpepper argues that (1) his trial counsel ineffectively represented him by failing to call two alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was suspended and causing death. At the jury trial, Graham stipulated that his operating privileges were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252022 - 2020-01-02
was suspended and causing death. At the jury trial, Graham stipulated that his operating privileges were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252022 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying his sentence modification motion.1 The issues are whether the trial court imposed an unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35637 - 2014-09-15
denying his sentence modification motion.1 The issues are whether the trial court imposed an unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35637 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Williams, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Williams, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which primarily was based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We agree with Raether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82768 - 2012-05-22
, which primarily was based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We agree with Raether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82768 - 2012-05-22
[PDF]
Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority v. Robert W. Stanek
of the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA). The Staneks argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
of the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA). The Staneks argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank Starich
of an intoxicant – fourth offense. Starich filed pre-trial motions including one to “dismiss for lack of probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant – fourth offense. Starich filed pre-trial motions including one to “dismiss for lack of probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lynn G.
the jury’s finding that she failed to assume parental responsibility; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6919 - 2017-09-20
the jury’s finding that she failed to assume parental responsibility; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6919 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
was appropriate. On cross appeal, the respondents contend that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8767 - 2017-09-19
was appropriate. On cross appeal, the respondents contend that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8767 - 2017-09-19