Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 83777 for case code.

Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah(Khan) v. Daniel Bertrand
test is a violation of Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.59(2), Kahn was given a conduct report notifying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11890 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CDPP Progress Report
There are currently eight class codes for commercial court docket cases:  Forty-one out of 81 cases have been
/supreme/docs/1605acdppreport.pdf - 2020-01-21

[PDF] Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
regulation under pertinent provisions of West Allis’s municipal code. Tee & Bee appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14732 - 2017-09-21

Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
Allis’s municipal code. Tee & Bee appeals from the trial court order denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14732 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the Motor Vehicle Code’s intoxicated driver statutes. The circuit court denied Hill’s motion.[2] Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111774 - 2014-05-06

[PDF] Reginald D. Phillips v. Department of Public Instruction
court judgment denying his motion to remand the case for further administrative proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7841 - 2017-09-19

Reginald D. Phillips v. Department of Public Instruction
appeals from a trial court judgment denying his motion to remand the case for further administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7841 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sylvester Hughes
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0638-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12164 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sylvester Hughes
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0638-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12164 - 2005-03-31

Maranatha Baptist Church v. City of Phillips
. The trial court held that the church was a permitted use under the City's commercial zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13169 - 2005-03-31