Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 9548 for jurors.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 9548 for jurors.
State v. Eugene Keeler
allegedly tampered with the jury and the jurors who were tampered with were deliberately not disclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31
allegedly tampered with the jury and the jurors who were tampered with were deliberately not disclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to strike juror S.Z. from the jury panel; (2) counsel failed to impeach witness J.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194577 - 2017-09-21
failed to strike juror S.Z. from the jury panel; (2) counsel failed to impeach witness J.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194577 - 2017-09-21
Shirley A. Gemas v. Susan R. Meyer
inventive, the Gemases’ argument fails. The special verdict submitted to the jurors expressly required them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12150 - 2005-03-31
inventive, the Gemases’ argument fails. The special verdict submitted to the jurors expressly required them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12150 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
strike to remove the African-American juror because that prospective juror had indicated he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104665 - 2017-09-21
strike to remove the African-American juror because that prospective juror had indicated he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104665 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
not notify any of the parties, but responded to the jurors’ requests as follows. The trial court (presumably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05
not notify any of the parties, but responded to the jurors’ requests as follows. The trial court (presumably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05
State v. Sandy Pegues
individually questioned the jurors to ascertain if they had heard the offending remarks. Eight jurors did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9112 - 2005-03-31
individually questioned the jurors to ascertain if they had heard the offending remarks. Eight jurors did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shirley A. Gemas v. Susan R. Meyer
fails. The special verdict submitted to the jurors expressly required them to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12150 - 2017-09-21
fails. The special verdict submitted to the jurors expressly required them to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12150 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Maldonado
of comments a prospective juror made during voir dire; and (5) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11713 - 2017-09-20
of comments a prospective juror made during voir dire; and (5) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11713 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael A. Maldonado
was denied his right to an impartial jury as a result of comments a prospective juror made during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11713 - 2005-03-31
was denied his right to an impartial jury as a result of comments a prospective juror made during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11713 - 2005-03-31
State v. Xiong Yang
because his trial counsel failed to inform him of his right to poll the jurors individually and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8705 - 2005-03-31
because his trial counsel failed to inform him of his right to poll the jurors individually and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8705 - 2005-03-31