Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 50070 for our.
Search results 1271 - 1280 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Deborah J.Z.
of statutory interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature, and, in doing so, our primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11496 - 2017-09-19
of statutory interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature, and, in doing so, our primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 48.415(1)(a)3. We conclude the court did not err. ¶7 Our Supreme Court has stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851737 - 2024-09-18
. STAT. § 48.415(1)(a)3. We conclude the court did not err. ¶7 Our Supreme Court has stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851737 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
charges resulting in convictions. Id. Because our supreme court concluded that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298168 - 2020-10-22
charges resulting in convictions. Id. Because our supreme court concluded that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298168 - 2020-10-22
[PDF]
Marcus P. Paulhe v. Monica M. Riley
support payor has made all requisite support payments. Our holding avoids an interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25792 - 2017-09-21
support payor has made all requisite support payments. Our holding avoids an interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25792 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard L. Verkler
, 217-18, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999), our supreme court held that law officers are under no affirmative duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31
, 217-18, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999), our supreme court held that law officers are under no affirmative duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶¶15, 33. ¶6 Following our decision, Theresa filed a “motion for entry of judgment.” In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257972 - 2020-04-14
., ¶¶15, 33. ¶6 Following our decision, Theresa filed a “motion for entry of judgment.” In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257972 - 2020-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal. The parties’ disputes here involve only the first and second amended complaints. Our background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
on appeal. The parties’ disputes here involve only the first and second amended complaints. Our background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. King
standard is incorrect with respect to the second Batson step, that our ruling on this point in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21
standard is incorrect with respect to the second Batson step, that our ruling on this point in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael J. Kidd
at the evidentiary hearing following our remand. He testified that he was “about 22” years old at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7168 - 2005-03-31
at the evidentiary hearing following our remand. He testified that he was “about 22” years old at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Laurie L. Gruber v. Village of North Fond du Lac
v. City of Brookfield, 66 Wis. 2d 296, 306, 224 N.W.2d 582 (1975). ¶3 Our task is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6145 - 2017-09-19
v. City of Brookfield, 66 Wis. 2d 296, 306, 224 N.W.2d 582 (1975). ¶3 Our task is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6145 - 2017-09-19